03/08/2010
PSA
A well-known society has just come out with yet another suggestion about PSA. Basically, they are suggesting that PSA should not be done in most cases. They also very carefully craft their words, saying that the physician should make sure the patient understands what are the implications of this decision.
Their main point is that there may be some unnecessary procedures, like ultrasound and biopsy, that may end up in complications or diagnosing a very early and non-aggressive cancer that may not need treatment at all.
I think everybody agrees that an 80-year-old man may not need a PSA. This is pure science; however, occasionally one may discover a patient with very aggressive cancer when it's too late. Malpractice lawyers may have a different view about that. I also wonder if this is a national trend, like the story on mammograms before, to cut down on the cost of health care by a unilateral, strictly financial consideration.